Section 7.3 Worksheet:

Assigned problems: Exercises pp. 364-366, #4, 9, 10, 11, 14, 19, 21, 22, 28, 32, 51, 60, 64, 79, 85, 103.

  1. Why is an antiderivative of 1/x equal to tex2html_wrap_inline202 , rather than simply tex2html_wrap_inline204 ?

  2. How can you use the fact that the natural log ( tex2html_wrap_inline204 ) is the inverse function of tex2html_wrap_inline208 to find the derivative of the log function, tex2html_wrap_inline204 ?

  3. Why would one want to use logarithmic differentiation? What advantage (if any!) does it offer?

Notes:

  1. Interesting (and mysterious) connection: the derivative of a log is a rational function! This is the ``missing power'': the power rule works for all exponents but -1. An antiderivative of tex2html_wrap_inline212 is tex2html_wrap_inline214 for all r but r=-1.

  2. Again, no need to worry about bases for logarithms other than base e, since it's easy to change from one to another. Are you able to show how?




Tue Nov 27 01:03:35 EST 2007