Section Summary: 11.4 - Polar Coordinates

  1. Definitions

    The polar coordinate system (introduced by Newton) is an alternative to the Cartesian coordinate system (named after Descartes) in which every point in the plane is expressed by its distance and direction (angle) from the origin, called the pole. The polar axis plays the role formerly played by the positive x-axis. The polar coordinates are often given as tex2html_wrap_inline150 , where

    The graph of a polar equation contains all points P that have at least one polar representation tex2html_wrap_inline150 whose coordinates solve the equation.

  2. Theorems

    None to speak of.

  3. Properties/Tricks/Hints/Etc.

    Given r and tex2html_wrap_inline154 it's easy to find the corresponding x and y:

    displaymath134

    It's not quite so easy to go in the opposite direction, unless we restrict r and tex2html_wrap_inline154 :

    displaymath135

    gives a unique representation in polar coordinates (except for the pole, which has equation r=0 regardless of the value of tex2html_wrap_inline154 ).

    As a convenience we let r take negative values: so

    displaymath136

    In any event, we see that, by contrast with the Cartesian coordinate system, the polar coordinate system allows points to have multiple representations.

    To find the Cartesian coordinates from the polar coordinates, we can use the equations

    displaymath137

    Be careful, however, as there are two values of tex2html_wrap_inline154 that solve these equations in each interval of tex2html_wrap_inline180 , and one must choose the proper value based on the quadrant in which (x,y) lies....

    To plot a polar equation, we may substitute into the equations for x and y:

    displaymath138

    and treat this as an ordinary parametric equation.

  4. Summary

    The Cartesian coordinate system is very nice for working with horizontal and vertical lines. It is very easy to represent them in Cartesian coordinates:

    In fact, the coordinate axes are, in fact, examples of each of these (x=0 and y=0).

    Similarly, the objects most easily represented in polar coordinates would have the form

    The first is the form of a circle centered at the origin, whereas the second is the equation of a ray shooting out from the origin, or pole. Notice that when one of these circles and one of these rays intersect, they do so at right angles (just like the coordinate axes in the Cartesian coordinate system).

    If you look at the drumheads shown on page 726, you'll see why this representation might be very useful: there is a lot of circular symmetry, and action along lines eminating from the origin. Situations of this type are often better treated in polar, rather than Cartesian, coordinates.

    As another example, my dad and I worked on this bust of Abe Lincoln, using cylindrical coordinates in three dimensions (and polar coordinates are two of the three coordinates used - the third is the z-coordinate). This was appropriate because the data to make the head was taken by measuring the distance of each point on the head from a central axis, as well as the angle from a fixed ray eminating from that axis.

    Just as in Cartesian coordinates, where equations are given in the form

    displaymath139

    (one coordinate in terms of the other), in polar coordinates equations often take the form

    displaymath140




Wed Oct 1 19:24:58 EDT 2003