Newton's method (or the Newton-Raphson method): a method for finding the roots, or zeros, of a function (i.e., those values of x such that f(x)=0). The method is based on the linearization of a function: we find the tangent line to a function at a point , and find where it has a root: we hope that this root is closer than to the true root, r.
Often these roots are simply approximations of the true roots, but may be good enough for our work. The method is based on the iterative formula
and a good initial guess (denoted , pronounced ``x-not''). From we calculate ; from we compute ; etc. If the sequence converges to some finite number, i.e.
then we have a root r of the function (as a check, compute f(r)).
To find a root to a given degree of accuracy (say five decimal places), we compute using the iterative formula until the successive iterates and agree to five decimal places.
None.
Newton's method may fail for various reasons:
Suppose that we seek the roots of f(x). The book suggests that the graph of f(x) and Newton's method may be used in tandom: the graph will provide a good starting guess , and Newton's method will provide a good approximation.
We are introduced to Newton's method for computing roots of a function, based on the linearization of the function. Once again, we replace a function by a closely related linear function, hoping that the linear function will inform us about the function itself. Linear functions are the simplest interesting functions we have, and they pop up constantly in mathematics (e.g. the slant asymptotes described in section 4.5 are good replacements for the original functions far from the origin).
Newton's method is an iterative method, meaning that we do the same thing over and over, and hope that results get successively better. This is quite likely the basic method on which your calculator's ``solve'' command is based.
It is possible to find different roots from different starting points, in the event that there are multiple roots (e.g. a quadratic equation may have two, etc.). This method often gives a good approximation, but there are a variety of reasons for why Newton's method may fail.
Problems to consider: pp. 297-298, #1, 4, 6, 13, 14, 27-30.