Remember, you have an exam next Friday. It will cover through the material that we're introducing today (Prime numbers).
Your problems on Bases and Fibonacci will be due Monday:
Show how to express 1729 in base 2.
Explain why we can't express 1729 using base 1.
Show how to add 147 and 173 (both numbers expressed in base 8)
Bring one thing from nature that illustrates Fibonacci numbers
Problems from section 2.2: pp. 60-61, #16, 18, 20, 22
For Monday: read section 3.1: Beyond Numbers
A glance back at Fibonacci numbers:
Fibonacci number decomposition and Fibonacci Nim
Rules:
Two players, n sticks/coins/bottlecaps/etc.
First player must take anywhere from 1 to
(n-1) sticks
From then on, the next player may take from 1 up
to twice what the previous player took.
Winner is the player who picks up the last stick
Is there a winning strategy?
Is there a perfect defensive strategy?
We "decompose" natural numbers using Fibonacci numbers and sums:
every natural number is either
Fibonacci, or
can be written as a sum of non-consecutive
Fibonacci's in a unique way.
Examples?
Can we justify this?
If a number is Fibonacci, then we're done.
Assume a number is not Fibonacci:
then there is a largest Fibonacci that "fits inside it" -- e.g. 24 = 21 + 3.
If the remainder (3, in the example above), after subtraction, is Fibonacci, how do we know that it is not consecutive (that is, that it is not 13)? That is, how do we know that the two Fibonacci numbers are not successive Fibonacci numbers?
If it is not Fibonacci, can we not simply repeat the current process of looking for a sum for a non-Fibonacci number, but using the remainder instead of the original number? (i.e. can we not simply "recurse" -- that is, do it again, and so construct a chain of numbers leading down towards 1.
Example: 33=21+12=21+8+4=21+8+3+1
Section 2.3: Prime Cuts of Numbers
Decomposing numbers, part III:
We can "decompose" (or factor) natural
numbers using prime numbers and products.
What is a prime number?
A natural number that can be divided
evenly (that is, without remainder) by
only two distinct natural numbers: 1 and
itself.
Every natural number greater than 1 is either prime, or it
can be expressed as a product of prime numbers (in one
and only one way -- order of the product aside).
Conclusion: gaps without primes of any size exist
in the natural numbers!
How many primes are there? There are infinitely many -- they just
don't stop! (But how do we know? We prove this
theorem!)
A natural number n may or may not divide natural
number m evenly, but there's always a unique way
of writing the attempt (that is, exactly one way -- no more):
m=qn+r
where 0 ≤ r ≤ n-1.
Obviously, if r=0 then n divides m.
We're going to show that there is a prime number bigger
than any number you can give.
Unanswered questions about prime numbers:
Goldbach Question: Can every even natural number
greater than 2 be written as the sum of two primes?
Twin Prime Question: are there infinitely many
pairs of prime numbers that differ from one another by
two? (3,5; 5,7; 11,13; etc. -- can you find another
pair in the sieve?)
Mathematicians don't know the answers yet!;)
Website maintained by Andy Long.
Comments appreciated.