Last Time | Next Time |
Today:
You should have received an email with a link to fill out your confidential evaluations for each class in which you are enrolled for this session.
Access the student login link at http://eval.nku.edu
Make sure that you pay attention to the writing. These should be coherent, well-constructed, 51st great mathematical ideas. Make sure that you can be proud of them!
Tuesday Thursday adkins acree bertram ball brooks brownfield burns colbert condit frye fulmer gasser hayes gudgeon helbig hancock reed huelsman riley isler simpson lotscher steelman north tindall pugliano xi riggs smith
I believe that it was adjusted as follows (correct me if I'm wrong!):
Tuesday | Thursday |
adkins | acree |
brooks | brownfield |
burns | colbert |
condit | frye |
fulmer | gasser |
hayes | huelsman |
helbig | hancock |
ball-riley | isler |
simpson | bertram-gudgeon |
steelman-pugliano | north |
tindall | reed-lotscher |
xi | riggs |
smith |
What conclusion can we reach? If you reached a correct conclusion, then you've properly performed a logical calculation.
So, in the baby example, the common term "crazy" is eliminated.
Examples (from p. 175, Lewis Carroll in Numberland)
Let us agree that a Red Counter, placed within a Cell, shall mean "This Cell is occupied" (i.e. "There is at least one Thing in it").
Let us also agree that a Red Counter, placed on the partition between two Cells, shall mean "The Compartment, made up of these two Cells, is occupied; but it is not known whereabouts, in it, its occupants are." Hence it may be understood to mean "At least one of these two Cells is occupied: possibly both are."
Our ingenious American cousins have invented a phrase to describe the condition of a man who has not yet made up his mind which of two political parties he will join: such a man is said to be "sitting on the fence." This phrase exactly describes the condition of the Red Counter.
Let us also agree that a Grey Counter, placed within a Cell, shall mean "This Cell is empty" (i.e. "There is nothing in it").
logically consistent?