You cannot show that a limit at a point exists by
showing that the limit is the same from two
directions. The limits under every approach must
be equal!
If you'll come and see me to discuss your test, you'll get 30% of
your missed points back.
Today's activity, and new assignment:
Fri
2/19
Discuss test; 20
Read 21-23
Homework to be determined.
Section 16: A few more words on the point at infinity
the function and the stereographic projection
Section 18: Derivatives
Last time you saw an example of a strange example: a function in some sense linear in the components of (that is,
so that
when ) which was nowhere differentiable wrt .
Example 2, p. 55 is even more bizarre (differentiable at a single point!)
What conditions must satisfy to be differentiable?
Section 19: Differentiation rules
As we've seen before, the rules for differentiation of functions
of a complex variable parallel those of real variable functions,
such as
power rules
constant multiples
product rule
quotient rule
chain rule
The derivations flow right from calculus (e.g. the product rule)
Your most recent homework includes problems relevant to this
section. Come with questions, if necessary.
Section 20: Cauchy-Riemann Equations: necessary conditions for differentiability
Well, we can get necessary conditions, by considering the limit
definition of the derivative and then two different approaches: in
order for the derivative to exist, we must get the same values along
the two different approaches.
In the end, we find that the following is necessary for a
function to be differentiable at a point: the partial derivatives of
the component functions must satisfy
at the point.
Check:
A polynomial (e.g.
That troublesome function
Website maintained by Andy Long.
Comments appreciated.