There's no rule like "it's always better to switch": I can
always rework a problem so that it's better to stick. Don't
worship false gods....
If you want to convince me that you've found a prime
number, tell me that you've checked all the primes up to the
square root of the number. What's
Sarah?
Write out the prime factorization in the end.
Annie and Kyle S. -- I'm calling you up to play!
You do have an assignment due today.
Question of the Day: Do we really only need two fingers to count?
How might "primitive" people have counted?
Review:
Tallies -- make a mark for each one, and then hand it over
Cairns -- a type of tally, only using stones to represent each participant
One-to-One correspondence, usually with body parts. So pointing at
a full set of fingers would mean "10" (but some civilizations
may have pointed at a left hip to mean 26!).
Then there's this "Counting by partition":
"Divide and conquer"
Is this how folks learned to count big numbers:
Dividing sheep into two groups, keeping track
of the remainder, and then reporting the result?
Upshot: We can count with only two fingers! Or two pens, or two symbols at
any rate....
Let's remind ourselves of how we might use a tree to represent the
solution to
the problem of counting 22 things: in the linked example, we
would get 10110 by writing the remainders from
left-to-right starting from the bottom of the tree.
(The result should always start with a 1 if done
correctly, since we always end with one sheep!)
But can you go backwards?
How many sheep is meant by 1,1,0,1,1,0,0?
How many sheep is meant by 1,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,1?
Try making a tree with these remainders.
and now let's count some coins:
We'll be counting pennies - in small groups.
Divide your penny rolls up (no need to do it evenly!)
Get your answer, then swap with another nearby group.
Compare (and record) your answers
Now, on to the Egyptians! (What's this got to do with Egyptians?)