Last Time | Next Time |
1 | 17 | |
1/2 | 8+1/2 | |
1/4 | 4+1/4 | * |
1/8 | 2+1/8 | * |
1/16 | 1+1/16 | * |
1/17 | 1 | |
1/34 | 1/2 | * |
1/68 | 1/4 | |
1/136 | 1/8 | |
1/272 | 1/16 | * |
So the answer is
Notice that the two methods give different results! That's not a problem, but a mathematician would really rather have a unique representation. In the absence of a unique representation, mathematicians look for some good reason for choosing one representation versus the other. What makes one of these better than the other, if anything?
So far we've been busting up numbers in different ways. The first way is illustrated by the number 1729, and its base 10 representation.
When we say "Seventeen twenty nine", what do we mean?
What does each of the digits in the number 1729 mean?
How would Fraudini write these numbers? | ||||||||
47 | = | 32 | +8 | +4 | +2 | +1 | ||
89 | = | 64 | +16 | +8 | +1 | |||
How would we write these numbers in base 2? | ||||||||
47 | = | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
89 | = | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
How can we understand this base-2 representation? In terms of powers and their places, obviously!
<body bgcolor="#FFF8DC">
What does #FFF8DC have to do with color?
One strategy to is convert from the starting base to base 10, then to do partition with a tree.
Here's an example: Convert 6257 to base 3.