Last time | Next time |
I personally think this to myself: "f prime of stuff times the derivative of the stuff"; or "f prime of stuff times stuff prime.",
where $f$ is the "outside" function:
You can see that the rule is fairly simple, once you've identified the composition -- that is, once you've torn apart $F$ to find $f$ and $g$.
We took a look at a file from my pre-calc class to review compositions. Remember?
Before we do that, however, I'd like to show how to derive the chain rule, using the limit definition of the derivative. Everything comes from that! I'll need to use a result from p. 153, where the chain rule is proved in our text.
Basically, however, it relies on the tangent line: we want to use the fact that
Why does that make sense? Because it comes straight out of the limit definition, where we throw away the limit. That's why we have to write "$\approx"$:
If time were measured in years from January, would
be a good model? What would be a good choice for the parameter $A$?