| Last time: started section 2.5 | Next time: sections 2.6/3.1 |
We'll review as long as you have questions, and then we'll switch to 3.1 if you run out of questions.
I want to look at one more example: #8, p. 165, which doesn't fit the two patterns of recurrence relations we've solved in closed forms (it doesn't have constant coefficients). Instead we try "guess, check, and verify".