Last time | Next time |
For the rest of you, you're all (or almost all) in your first or second choice.
Here are your specific roles in the paper (I'll say more about these later; but let's keep our focus on the exam at the moment.):
We'll all be part of this, to some extent; but we need a team to make sure that it gets the attention it deserves. This involves residual analysis, parameter assessment (significance, inclusion, etc.).
Matthew, Clayton, Parker (Head Ringer!:)
This unit will have sole responsibility for interacting with the Togolese, to answer our questions.
So someone who is interested in diplomacy would be good to have in charge!:)
Maria M., Head; Connor
Leah, Head; Jacob K.
This portion is a very straight-forward set of tasks, so I don't think that you'll have any questions; but it will involve software.
However, I criticized his suggestion to fit the data of page 19 (and Figure 10) with an exponential model: so we talked about how to "do it right" (IMHO), using a logistic growth model, and non-linear regression.
We can see the weight asymptoting by week 20. It's clearly NOT appropriate to model this with an exponential, as Alexander curiously suggests (see Figure 12, p. 23), although he may have been focused on the short term, relatively unbridled growth at the beginning. If so, he should not have used the later data points in the regression....
So the regression serves the purpose of providing parameter estimates for a general (differential equations) model for corn seedling growth.
This is not "typical", in some sense, of logistic growth. For example, "carrying capacity" is the wrong terminology: and the initial value is never greater than the "carrying capacity" -- the corn seedling doesn't start out monstrous, and then shrivel to a stalk...:)
This model is appropriate if the growth ($dw/dt$) in the weight $w(t)$ of the seedling is