Last time | Next time |
I found the word "osculate" used in this terribly interesting article about milk. I don't encounter the word much (outside of math):
Sandra Steiger of the University of Bayreuth in Germany and her colleagues recently reported on an American species, Nicrophorus orbicollis -- a handsome, inchlong burying beetle with orange and black stripes -- in which both parents care for their young. A parent beetle will eat a bit of carrion, predigest it and, on being tapped on the mouth by an offspring's front legs, transfer the morsel into the little supplicant's mouth.
"It's like kiss-feeding," Dr. Steiger said. "It looks really nice." But as the researchers demonstrated, there is more to the osculatory exchange than pulped meat: the parent's oral fluids are also critical to the young beetle's survival.
Nothing says love like kiss-feeding...?:) I like "little supplicant", too: that's what I'm going to start calling my younger son, the college freshman!
The following table (thanks Wikipedia) illustrates the situation in a typical medical context. Imagine that you're testing for AIDS. You either have it, or you don't. Now, suppose that you're tested for AIDS. The test either says you have it, or it doesn't. There are two kinds of errors the test can make:
If the null hypothesis is that you have AIDS, the first error is called a Type I error, while the second error is a Type II:
Actual condition | |||
---|---|---|---|
Present | Absent | ||
Test result |
Positive | Condition Present + Positive result = True Positive |
Condition absent + Positive result = False Positive Type I error |
Negative | Condition present + Negative result = False (invalid) Negative Type II error |
Condition absent + Negative result = True (accurate) Negative |
Let's remind ourselves about the distribution of $\hat{p}$:
Now in this case we don't have $p$. We want to find $p$. So how do we proceed? That's the subject of this packet.