Last Time | Next Time |
Speaking of Spring break, have a good one! Relax.
Effective Tuesday, March 8, masks will be optional on campus, with these exceptions:
Buck says this "Confronted with an artifact from an ancient culture, one asks several questions:
As base 60 people, the Babylonians used powers of 60 to write their numbers. They had 59 digits (because they didn't have the 60th -- 0, my hero!) -- the numbers from 1-59.
We concluded that this is a table of two columns of two columns: integers on the left, and their multiples of 9 on the right. I think that we've got this one down cold.
The Babylonian used places for 60s and 1s, at least (and we suspect that they have a $60^2=3600$ place as well, and so on.
Sadly, they were not acquainted with zero.
(favorite lyrics: "et cetera, et cetera; ad infinitum; ad astra1; forever and ever")
So, as we turn to the new world, is there any improvement in the zero situation?
We deduced that
So we would have expected their places to continue like \[ (20^0, 20^1, 20^2, \ldots)=(1, 20, 400, \ldots) \]
But they don't! Look at the 708 entry.... There is one dot in the next place up. What must its value be?
After that, they resume using powers of 20! So their places are the (1, 20, 360, 7200, etc.): $(20^0, 20^1, 20*18, 20^2*18, 20^3*18, etc.)$
Do you see how this 177 explains Savannah's observation about the third place?
Think about making change, and just using strange bills: for the Babylonians, you use