Last Time | Next Time |
For example, some of you didn't have a thing to say about Yang Hui's triangle (which figured prominently in the agendas). That spells trouble....
So in how many ways can we write order six things?
\(6! = 6 \cdot 5 \cdot 4 \cdot 3 \cdot 2 \cdot 1 = 720\).
For combinations, order doesn't count: we're just choosing \(p\) things from \(n\) things.
We saw the parallels between multiplying 23*42 and dividing 966 by 42.
23=16+4+2+1 |
|
672+168+84+42 = 966 |
For example divide 40 by 8:
1 | 8 | |
2 | 16 | |
4 | 32 |
So the answer is 5 (how do we get 5?)
Let's look at an example: divide 35 by 8.
In a way we turn it into a multiplication problem: what times 8 equals 35? So we know the 8, and use it to "double" -- but then to "halve", when 8 won't go evenly into 35:
1 | 8 | |
2 | 16 | |
4 | 32 | |
1/2 | 4 | |
1/4 | 2 | |
1/8 | 1 |
So the answer is 4+1/4+1/8
But they didn't restrict themselves to "halving", as our next example shows (in which they also "seventh"ed -- then they doubled that!).
Divide 6 by 7:
1 | 7 | |
1/2 | 3+1/2 | |
1/4 | 1+1/2+1/4 | |
1/7 | 1 | |
1/14 | 1/2 | |
1/28 | 1/4 | |
So the answer is 1/2+1/4+1/14+1/28 (we usually order them from largest to smallest).
Notice that the Egyptians didn't use decimals -- you shouldn't either! They also didn't combine fractions, or use mixed numbers (so they wrote "3 + 1/2" rather than "3 1/2").
Why did Egyptians do things this way? (an example division problem, 3/5).
Dominic Olivastro, "Ancient Puzzles", suggests a third reason why this use of unary fractions is good. Consider the problem Ahmes poses of dividing 3 loaves of bread between 5 people. We would answer "each person gets 3/5-ths of a loaf". If we implemented our solution, we might then cut 2 loaves into 3/5 | 2/5 pieces, with bread for 3 people; then cut one of the smaller pieces in half, giving the other two people 2/5 + 1/5 pieces. Mathematically acceptable, but try this with kids and they will insist that it is not an even division. Some have larger pieces, some have smaller.
Samm said it's called "sibling math"
(and this family Circus comic shows why!).
Ahmes would calculate 3/5 as : 3/5 = ()3 + ()5 + ()15 [ = 1/3 + 1/5 + 1/15 ] Now cut one loaf into fifths, cut two more into thirds, then take one of the 1/3-rd pieces and cut it into 5-ths (for the 1/15-th pieces), and you can now distribute everyone's 3/5-ths share in a way that _looks_ equal, since they will have exactly the same size pieces. (And no, I don't want to argue about the crust.)
so we look up $\frac{2}{7}$ in the unit fraction table, and find that $\frac{2}{7}=\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{28}$. Therefore,
\[ \displaystyle \frac{6}{7}= 2*(\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{28})+\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{28}= \frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{14}+\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{28} \]
(Start with halves, and then what?)
We're going to do three things today: solve two mysteries, and celebrate our hero Zero.
You should be ready to get the joke. And I'm hoping that, by the end of the day, you'll have come up with some more joke shirts!
The author, Prof. Buck, guesses that "the document" (actually a clay tablet) comes from the city of Nippur, in what is now Iraq:
Buck says this "Confronted with an artifact from an ancient culture, one asks several questions:
Your job: to describe the markings, and investigate the patterns on this tablet.
Well let it be unsung no more! I hope that you'll enjoy this rendition of
(favorite lyrics: "et cetera, et cetera; ad infinitum; ad astra1; forever and ever")
Watch Dave Brubeck's leg, counting out the rhythm....