Vol. 29, No.2, March 1998
We reproduce here the figures from the article in color, and in larger size, and add stereo views, and a movie sequence, which might aid the reader.
The intent of this article was twofold:
|
First of all to examine
visually the function
|
Figure 2 [Zoom] |
And, secondly, to utilize the Fubini surface
as a tool in understanding a more complicated surface - a
minimal surface known as the Costa Surface and visually studied by David
and James Hoffman. Shown here.
A new exhibit, Beyond Numbers, at the Maryland Science Center in Baltimore contains a nice display of this surface. |
Figure 3 [Zoom] |
Iterated integrals leading to different results for the Fubini surface.This view of the Fubini surface sliced by the plane y = .5 shows that the integral with respect to x will be negative for all values of y. (Here is a graph of this cross section to make it clearer.) However, the correponding view with a plane in the other direction is this curve inverted, which means a positive value for the integral with respect to y for all values of x. And thus the second integrations will then be of opposite signs. Actually the two iterated integrals on [-1,1] x [-1,1] are -¹ and ¹. Hence, the double integral fails to exist.We have drawn the level curves on the surface. The key observation here is that the level curves are nested lemniscates (except at (0,0), and since all level curves converge to the origin, every real number is taken on in every neighborhood. So there cannot be a limit there. The function fails to be continuous at (0,0), hence Fubini's Theorem does not apply. |
Figure 4
[Zoom]
An MPEG movie of this transition.
An animated GIF.
Figure 3 was done with Maple, Figure 2 was provided by James Hoffman, Scientific Graphics Project, MSRI. All others were raytraced with Rayshade.
Thomas Hern
(hern@math.bgsu.edu),
Cliff Long
(long@math.bgsu.edu)
Bowling Green State University
Andy Long
(ael@maya.medctr.luc.edu)
Fulbright Scholar in Benin, West Africa.