A finite state machine cannot "self-flush": each input results in a single output, so if there is "padding" required it takes away from the "real" output.
Our machine is much more complex than hers, however - she beats us in minimization! What I didn't like about hers was the states' labels: for example, there is no state labelled as s0. I was also confused by them, thinking that she was considering the input pairwise, when in fact it fairly reflected the role of each state. So now I like hers okay - but it still doesn't flush!
As an example of minimization, we'll show how our machine and her machine are equivalent.
Because we'll have a little more time for the final, expect a few more "in depth" problems.
Overall, however, the problems you see will look like the homework, so a good strategy is to go over the sections and recall what we've done. Also look over the overviews I gave you for the last exams. I won't pull in any ringers not on those sheets.