Last time: Fit the Sixth | Next time: Fit the Seventh |
Today:
Example:
5 voters' ranking | 5 voters' ranking | 5 voters' ranking | |
First Place | A | B | C |
Second Place | B | C | A |
Third Place | C | A | B |
Here's the main, astonishing result:
That is, one person makes the decision.
It was not a "fluke" that different methods gave different results. As mentioned in the text, mathematicians can "rig" a seemingly benign system that will hand the election over to a preferred candidate.
6 boys prefer | 4 boys prefer | 8 girls prefer | 4 girls prefer | |
First Choice | Chad | Chad | Gwyn | Courtney |
Second Choice | Courtney | Gwyn | Courtney | Gwyn |
Third Choice | Gwyn | Courtney | Chad | Chad |
Three voting schemes, three different winners.
This one was proposed for situations like the "Nader voting" that helped defeat Al Gore and so elect George Bush in 2000: if Nader voters could have used instant run-off, they could have voted for their favorite (Nader), but then fallen back to Gore when Nader didn't take the vote.
Carroll basically proposes double-elimination tournaments.
Abeles points out, "Dodgson's main concerns were selecting the most preferred candidates to hold office, conducting elections properly, promoting minority representation, and achieving fair representation"
Full fathom five thy father lies;
Of his bones are coral made;
Those are pearls that were his eyes:
Nothing of him that doth fade,
But doth suffer a sea-change
Into something rich and strange.
Sea-nymphs hourly ring his knell:
Ding-dong.
Hark! now I hear them -- Ding-dong, bell.