Last time | Next time |
Today:
Almost no one discussed the comparison of the plots. Why not?
It seems clear to me that many of you aren't checking your answers with either a graphing calculator (e.g. TI-89) or Mathematica. I suggest the latter, because you can download my files and try these yourself. You can check your own work, and know what your objective is in integrating these.
This again represents a change in our course from the past, where we professors could assume that you each had the power to check your own work with a consistent calculator. But we now provide Mathematica, which is much more powerful. You need to take advantage of that!
"dA" is called an "infinitesimal" -- it's a tiny chunk of area -- tinier than anything you know ("vanishingly small")!
What's numerical integration all about? We do pretty much the same thing, only we have
where the are small, but not vanishingly small.
but as the image to the right (above) and the graphical insight below show, we can think of the Midpoint rule as being a "Tangent rule":
Be careful however not to confuse the midpoint and trapezoidal rule. The trapezoid represented above is not the same as the trapezoid of the trapezoidal rule.
(their arithmetic average, in this case).
Notice that the number of subintervals in Simpson's rule must be even.
Now we can go further:
(their weighted arithmetic averages).
Here are the error bounds, that illustrate that the errors of midpoint and trapezoidal are related, and suggest how to combine them to create a better method (Simpson's rule):