- Announcements:
- Reminder: turn off your rectangles!
- Your first assignment is returned.
Your score is out of 2. One point for Pascal's Triangle, and one point
for Yanghui's next line, using bamboo counting rods.
I did ask you to "Include an explanation of how you chose to represent
any numbers that haven't already appeared in the table."
You have to justify your work. I want to know how you were thinking
when you made your choices. Otherwise, for all I know, you just put
down counting rods randomly....
- You have a new
assignment, due next Thursday. Remember: justify your work!
Question of the Day: How did the Babylonians write numbers?
- Last time we discovered another use of the powers of 2; an ancient use which I called "primitive counting": How might "primitive" people have
counted? (We used a mathematical concept called a "tree" (a type of graph) to help us. More on those later....)
We talked about some possible strategies:
- Tallies
(you assigned reading for today talked more about tallies).
- One-to-one correspondence
- using body parts -- "one hand" of sheep, say -- meaning
five sheep.
- cairns
- And then an unusual method of "counting by partitions" that
Patricia Baggett and Andrzej Ehrenfeucht proposed at the 2011
National Math Meetings.
- They proposed that primitive societies may have counted
this way. Let's suppose you need to let the King know how many
sheep you have:
- divide your sheep equally ("one for you, one for me") into
two pens: either there is one left over, or not. You make a
note of whether there is one left over or not.
- Send all the sheep in pen two (and any "left over") out to
pasture, and then
- You divide the sheep in pen one into pens one and two:
i.e., just do it again! And again, and again, and.... until you
get down to a pen one with just sheep in it.
- Now let's see how we might record the results to send to
the King.
The easiest way to illustrate the counting method is via a
tree.
Let's see how we might use a tree to represent the solution to
the "22" counting problem: in the linked example, we
would get 10110 by writing the remainders from
left-to-right starting from the bottom of the tree.
(The result should always start with a 1 if done
correctly, since we always end with one sheep!)
The answer will be written as 1, 0, 1, 1, 0
That is, from the bottom up, left to right. This is
important! We have to have a consistent scheme for
writing.
So how do we write
- 9 sheep
- 31 sheep
- 54 sheep
- Can you go backwards? How many sheep is meant by
- 1,1,0,1,1,0,0
- 1,1,0,1,1,0,0
- 1,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,1
Try making a tree with these remainders.
- We then considered Chapter 2 from our text: rock groups, exploring
with pennies and partners.
Each of these number concepts can easily be understood using pennies:
- prime,
- composite,
- square, and
- triangular numbers
but understand them as concrete things, as objects (e.g. pennies).
So we're interested in arranging our pennies (i.e. rocks) in groups
with certain properties.
I caught my son using these ideas to put some of his change into rolls
to cash in. Those are dimes he's working with. Question for
you detectives out there: what did he do next?
All numbers of pennies can be arranged into a line (this is Humphrey's
"Furry Arms" method):
Some numbers of pennies (composites) can be arranged into
- If a number greater than one can be expressed as a
rectangle of more than one row, then it is composite;
otherwise, it is prime. The rows must stack to form a
rectangle, which means that they can be put in one-to-one
correspondence with each other (see the picture above).
Another way of saying that a number is composite is to say that
it can be broken up into groups (each with more than one
member) that can each be put into one-to-one correspondence
with each other (that is, each element in one group has a
partner in another -- and just one partner. Perfect for the
dance....).
So 9 is an example, a square. It can be broken into three
groups of three; so each group of three can be put into one-to-one
correspondence with any other group of three.
Notice that we said greater than one in the definition
above. The number 1 is special, and considered neither prime
nor composite.
We've already heard this important rule, which you learned at
some point in your mathematical education:
Every natural number (other than 1) is either prime, or can be expressed as
a product of primes in a unique way.
- There is an interesting observation made by the author. It was
about odds and evens. What do Strogatz notice about the sum of
- odd and even
- odd and odd
- even and even
Let's make a table to illustrate that:
Rock groups suggest formulas for representing even and odd numbers:
- How do we say the formula suggested at the top of page 10?
(By the way, add one more row to the top of the equations near
the top of the page - what would the row be?
How would you say what's happening in words? What do you think of
the proof of the "theorem" at the bottom of the page?
- Do you see the theorem expressed in the rocks?
- Can you see the form "2n+1" in the rocks?
- I see a new theorem: T5+T4=52
(In words, "the sum of the fourth and fifth triangular
numbers is the fifth square".) By playing with rocks we
discover relationships. It's probably how primitive
civilizations did it, too!
- The story of the "The Housekeeper and the Professor" is
interesting, and modelled on a famous mathematical event -- the story
of child prodigy Carl Friedrich Gauss:
Once again, rock groups give us a formula for representing triangular numbers.
So let's go through the reasoning for the housekeeper's answer.
- Now let me introduce the Babylonians (or, rather, their
mathematics). I want to introduce you to them via a "detective
story": I hope that you all like detective
stories.... The story is called Detective
in the times of Babylon. Let's see if we can solve this mystery
before the end of class:
What can we deduce about
- the Babylonians and place value?
- the purpose of the table?
- the Babylonian's missing number(s)?
How would the Babylonians write these numbers:
- 3600
- 573
- 14001
- Now, if we get through all of that, we'll reflect on some of the
things that we discover in chapter 6 of our text: here are a few of my
musings:
- How cumbersome are the Roman numerals! How would you write
your own birth year?
- "biology is deeply embedded" in number systems (10 "digits"
in our system; tallies of 5; 5 and 10 in Roman numerals; 10 in
Babylonian; 5 and 20 for the Mayans)
- Babylonians based their system on -- its prime factorization gives it lots of factors.
- We need no new symbol for 10 in our arabic numerals: we use only
the digits 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 -- and place value
(hence the name of the chapter: "location, location, location").
- Place value suddenly makes arithmetic possible. "Just
master a few facts", our author says.
My own musing:
it's interesting that we seem to be abdicating our
arithmetic to machines. Many educated people can't do
arithmetic anymore....
- The unsung hero is the digit 0 -- a symbol for nothing!
(The Babylonians can't distinguish the numbers 1 from 60,
without some additional context.)
- Binary, or base 2 math: a place-value system with just two
symbols, 0 and 1. Perfect for computers....
- Cornell built the first telegraph line (Baltimore to
Washington, D.C.): 1844. I know that the telegraph
displaced the
pony express, which only ran for one year, at the
beginning of the Civil War (1860-1861).