Last Time | Next Time |
The six simple cards each represent a power of two, and we discovered that there's only one way to represent a counting number as a sum of distinct powers of two.
So once your "opponent" points to the cards which contain their number, you just add up the cards, and you tell them their number. Magic! Not....
We talked about some possible counting strategies:
They proposed that primitive societies may have counted this way. Let's suppose you need to let the King know how many sheep you have:
We have also learned a few lessons from Sesame Street:
The essence of "fiveness", say, is that you can take your favorite set of five things -- say the fingers on a hand -- and if you can match them up exactly with another set of things (e.g. the toes on one foot) -- each one with a unique partner -- then you know that you have exactly five toes, too.
All the counting numbers up to a certain number (e.g. five) is a particularly good set of favorite things. So when we say the numbers "{1,2,3,4,5}" in order, we are thinking of that as "fiveness", and we are partnering up our fingers or toes with "five", to say we have five fingers or toes.
The process of counting is the process of partnering, and creating the "one-to-one" mapping.
(This might seem entirely obvious for "five", but wait until we get to "infinity"! Then you'll be glad that you understand the one-to-one mapping!)
You've no doubt known for a long time that there are prime numbers and composite numbers, but you may not have thought of the prime numbers as those you have to represent as rocks in a line, and composite numbers as those whose rocks you can put into more interesting rectangles.
Yesterday I was telling my wife how to spell "snopes" (she was going to check and see if, in fact, the Bernie Inauguration Meme is really available on a sweatshirt), and I told her to go to "snopes". She said "how do you spell snopes?", and I said
and I realized that I'd blocked it to make it easier for her to get the spelling.
Here are a few of my musings:
My own musing: it's interesting that we seem to be abdicating our arithmetic to machines, and imply that it's not important to do arithmetic anymore. I would say that basic numeracy is tremendously important -- but oftentimes, more important than the exact answer is a good estimate. We could work harder to develop that skill.
Well let it be unsung no more! I hope that you'll enjoy this rendition of
Today we're going to play Sherlock Holmes, and solve a mystery.
The author, Prof. Buck, guesses that the document comes from the city of Nippur, in what is now Iraq:
How would the Babylonians write these numbers: