Last time: | Next time: |
Then we'll be ready for Chapter 3: Applications of the Derivative
that
This is a composition, but it's a simple composition of a linear
function with the exponential function
(I hope that you will soon think that the chain rule makes your life easy!:).
Just as before, but once again we have to restrict the domain: |
sine is not invertible. We have a choice, but it seems like the best
place to think of sine as invertible is on the interval
|
|
|
We proceed just as before, but once again we have to restrict the
domain: cosine and tangent are not invertible. We have a choice, but it
seems like the best place to think of tangent as invertible is on the
interval
Once we've drawn it, it's easy to draw in the inverse function: | Notice that arctan is a nice S-shaped curve, which is frequently used in math modeling to transition gradually between two states over a period of time: |
![]()
|
You might recognize that it looks a lot like the arcsin function: in fact, we can see that it is the reflection of arcsin about the y-axis, followed by a shift up by |
That means we can get its derivative by the chain rule:
|
|
|
We'll approach this topic via some examples, such as the ones given in the section intro, and in the section preview. Let's start with the preview, as a sort of warm-up.
We know how to differentiate y with respect to x, using
the power rule:
But there's another way to think about this relationship, and that's
This gives no priority to either variable -- it's symmetric in both.
(This means that the graph of
We can still differentiate to find y'(x), however, using the
product rule and something called "implicit differentiation". We
consider
are equal, the derivatives of both sides must be equal (we made the same argument when we used the chain rule to find the derivative of inverse functions!).
We differentiate both sides, and equate them (using the product rule on
the left). From this we obtain the correct derivative, as well:
One of the issues is that this is not the graph of a function -- it fails the vertical line test. But it is clearly a really important graph for us to be able to do calculus on (e.g. make tangent lines).
One approach to dealing with this object is to divide it into two
separate functions: an upper and a lower function, which would look
like this:
The figure illustrates an example of a problem one might want to solve
for the graph above: what is the slope of the tangent to the circle
that goes through the point
I can think of two ways to solve this:
The geometric solution shown in the figure is to use the slope
But let's do it implicitly, by "differentiating the equation of the circle":
But you can see that this fails the vertical line test -- we can't call it the graph of a function.
Q: What is the equation of the tangent line shown? (Actually we can use symmetry alone to answer this question! That's a powerful notion....)
Even though the graph is not the graph of a function (either
Q: What are the two equations of the tangent line to the point (0,0)?
Because the equation is symmetric in
So if