Last Time | Next Time |
Knots actually have a scientific importance. Of course chemists like to mess around with them:
If you would like to submit that, do so by midnight tonight!
Then we'll have another art contest.
(If you already sent me your picture, you're done!)
See? Sticks are beloved, too! And stick fractals are even cooler!
But in the case of knots it's not so easy. We have two tools, and the first is the Reidemeister moves:
Type I | Type II | Type III |
Here's a picture of an unknot, which could trick you -- but you're not deceived, because you know your Reidemeister moves, in particular the R1 move.
Before moving on to tricolorability, let's review how to use the Reidemeister moves, and see how the two concepts relate:
Reidemeister Move I is tricolorable. | Reidemeister Move II is tricolorable. | Reidemeister Move III is tricolorable. |
---|---|---|
The unknot is not tricolorable ("At least two colors must be used") | The trefoil knot is tricolorable: | The figure-eight knot is not tricolorable (it requires four colors): "The figure-eight knot is not tricolorable. In the diagram shown, it has four strands with each pair of strands meeting at some crossing. If three of the strands had the same color, then all strands would be forced to be the same color. Otherwise each of these four strands must have a distinct color. Since tricolorability is a knot invariant, none of its other diagrams can be tricolored either." (source) |
So, for example: if you've got your picture of a knot down to three crossings, and it's not tricolorable, then it's the unknot.
Which of the 6- and 7-knots are tricolorable? (There are three.)