Centre-Satellite models

You may recall that we studied compound and generalized Poisson models using the Matui Housing data of Cliff and Ord (spatial statistics module, part I). Upton and Fingleton, in Spatial Data Analysis by Example (p. 16) have a problem with those models:

"The compound and generalized Poisson models contain one particularly unrealistic constraint, namely that the `offspring' are coincident with the `parent' - in other words, they suppose that the entire cluster is situated at a single point."

Thus we add displacement (so-called centre-satellite models - note cool British spelling, since I stole this from those brits):

"Unfortunately, the added realism of these processes results in most intractable mathematics and none of their results seems likely to be of very great assistance for the data analyst." Upton and Fingleton, Spatial Data Analysis by Example, p. 17.

We show here a similar situation, although the pattern was created in a slightly different way.

The diseased individuals are marked with the red crosses (get it?! Sorry...), while the healthy individuals are blue boxes.

This example was created as follows:

  1. a set of "susceptible" points was simulated randomly on the unit square;
  2. another set of "infected" points was added;
  3. each infected individual infects a group of susceptible neighbors, the number infected distributed as a Poisson variable - but only neighbors within a radius of .1 units of the infected point. (If there were not enough neighbors within that radius, all available were infected, but no more).
Thus we might expect to see spatial autocorrelation at a scale of about .1 units.

Below is the isotropic sample variogram, plotted with a model:

It is a "nested" model (that is, a positive linear combination of valid models). The model is composed of

The model was generated automatically using the UNIX version of the Geo-EAS software package. A form of weighted least squares is used to determine a model, which the user is then free to adjust.

This is an example of "indicator kriging": rather than rates, or some other continuous variable, we are actually trying to estimate the probability that someone is ill at a given location by using the binary variable of "disease status". Here is the resulting kriged surface:

which one can use to create a contour map, representing the probability of being diseased.


Website maintained by Andy Long. Comments appreciated.
aelon@sph.umich.edu