Last Time | Next Time |
I like to see you making the row operations explicit.
That being said, I liked how some of you used "advanced methods" (i.e. augmented matrices) to solve these -- you're getting a little ahead of the section, but it allows you to practice a new technique against an old method.
Alignment is important: make your intermediate systems line up (in the variables).
Check your work using the answer pdf.
Do we have two solutions?
Because we had three equations in three unknowns, it was quite likely that we would have an inconsistent system -- which is what happened. Geometrically, what is the interpretation of the search for a solution?
You must justify your answers! The linear system has an infinite number of solutions, only one of which is practically possible.
As in section One.I.2, we're essentially reformulating the solution. We know how to solve for a solution of a linear system (if there is one); it's more a matter of how we represent it, or how we think of it.
In addition, we encounter a corollary (which is a theorem that follows directly, once a theorem has been proven).
Let's consider an example -- the matrix system of example 2.7, which we considered earlier. Let's see how the solution can be written as a sum of these two kinds of vector solutions.
Let's take a look at page 22, for examples with unique versus infinitely many solutions.
This gives rise to a homogeneous system (one of whose solutions is "zeros all around" -- or, as we'll say, the zero vector.