Last time | Next time |
Today:
I want to start with a reminder of why we're doing all this crazy stuff about convergence/divergence.
As I've told you, it's ultimately about replacing functions with "infinite polynomials". For example, we know that the geometric series with common ratio converges if :
We might just as well write
which converges if !
So we've replaced the rational expression by the "infinite polynomial" (for some of its domain -- but not all of it).
If x happens to be negative, then we have an alternating series on the right hand side.
That being said, a theorem below does give us some help in determining the value of (or at least bounds on the value of) the series of a type called an "alternating" series. In particular, we want to look at alternating series like the one below:
So it turns out that if the terms are converging to 0, then the alternating sequence converges to a limit.
Now we usually write our alternating series in the following way, illustrated by Leibniz's test: we assume that the are positive, and the term takes care of the "alternation". (Our textbook switches to for the positive part of the term.)
Our textbook calls this the "Alternating Series Test" (p. 751). The "Furthermore" part our textbook calls the "Alternating Series Estimation Theorem" (p. 754).
We need to show that the terms of the series satisfy the Leibniz test:
Identify the terms , and decide whether they satisfy the Leibniz test.
Remember that for convergence, the conditions of the test need be true only eventually: convergence is all about the tail, not the head of the sequence.
For this one, we need the "Alternating Series Estimation Theorem" (p. 754):
This result says that eventually the ratio of successive terms is effectively constant, : the terms of the sequence approach a "common ratio" as . What kind of series looks like that? A geometric series:
Examples:
The ratio test is effectively a self-referrential comparison test: we compare terms of with other terms (rather than with some other series).
This result says that eventually the absolute values of the terms are effectively equal to : what kind of series looks like that? A geometric series!
No wonder the results of the tests look exactly the same.... Too bad we didn't just use the same letter for the limits in both cases!
Notice that, once again, limits of sequences plays an important role! Series are just sums of sequences, after all; we're focused on how terms behave (root test), how successive terms behave (ratio test), or how partial sums behave.
Examples: