Last time | Next time |
Today:
(Note that this illustrates the deduction method.)
It's redundant: you can always throw the hypotheses of an argument into the conclusion. So its also true that
even more redundant!
The bigger scope issue is forgetting to extend your parrentheses or brackets enough, so that a dangling $x$ becomes free.
For example, in that wff above I might forget the brackets:
$(\forall x) D(x) \rightarrow (S(x) \rightarrow R(x))$
In which case the $x$ in $(S(x) \rightarrow R(x))$ is free -- is different from the $x$ referenced in the antecedent.
Remember the problems:
Please save your work as a single pdf (lots easier for me to grade), and upload that to Canvas. Remember to keep the grader happy! You don't want a grumpy grader, trust me; they're not nearly as sympathetic!:)