next up previous
Next: Cross-validation Up: Geostatistical Mapping Techniques Previous: Derivation of the Kriging

Variogram Modelling

For modelling I like Myers's 1991 paper ``On Variogram Estimation'' [3] for a general overview. (This paper considers much more than the estimation of variograms, including criteria for cross-validation.)

The usual estimator of the variogram function for lag tex2html_wrap_inline562 (that is, for those pairs separted by a vector tex2html_wrap_inline562 ) is

displaymath560

where tex2html_wrap_inline566 is the number of distinct pairs of data values, placed in the set tex2html_wrap_inline568 (pairs displaced by the vector tex2html_wrap_inline562 ). I have shown in a previous lecture (lecture 3) that the sample variogram obtained using this estimator can be considered a spatial decomposition of the sample variance.

Variograms are modelled using the class of conditionally negative definite (CND) functions. It's not so important that you understand what that means, but you should know that it's not just any function which can serve as a variogram model. At present there is a ``zoo'' of functions which we use in the modelling functions, some of whose members we will look at below.

Any function which is CND can be used as a model: however, to ensure that the kriging system is invertible, it is essential that the CND function be strictly CND. The valid isotropic models (provided in the popular public-domain geostatistical software package Geo-EAS [1]) are

(The factor of ln(20) in the gaussian and exponential models appears because the range r of those models is defined as the point at which the model attains 95% of its sill, c.) The linear model does not have a range, but increases linearly as tex2html_wrap_inline546 .

The Guassian model and power models (for tex2html_wrap_inline548 ) are the only model above that are ``concave up'' around zero (that is, shaped like a bowl that could hold water). The others are either flat (linear, nugget), or concave down at the origin.

Since conditionally negative definite functions form a positive cone in the space of functions (which is to say that positive linear combinations of such functions are again conditionally negative definite), one strategy for modelling variograms is to use positive combinations of known valid models to fit sample variograms. No one has yet developed, to our knowledge, a more general method.

Oftentimes, variograms are modelled using a weighted least-squares non-linear optimization, which is more complicated than it sounds, actually....


next up previous
Next: Cross-validation Up: Geostatistical Mapping Techniques Previous: Derivation of the Kriging

Andrew E Long
Mon Mar 8 23:49:41 EST 1999