Last time | Next time |
Today:
Many people will make the mistake of thinking that the inverse function is the same as
The real problem is that we mathematicians are too lazy: we keep reusing notation, even to the confusion of our students.... We need to be attentive, and interpret the notation in context. Mathematicians are not alone, however: the same is found in language, right? What is "lead"? Did I lead a squad to victory, or were we mowed down in a shower of lead? If so, I led my squad astray....
I almost commented yesterday on one of my pet-peeves of our language:
So ambiguity and confusion is not the exclusive problem of mathematics.
This pair of graph should remind of us two important concepts that you will have heard about in science classes at some point: doubling time, and half-life.
This is written mathematically as
The concept of "exponential growth" is often misused in common parlance, however: you'll often hear someone say that something's "growing exponentially!" -- by which they mean what? Growing really, really fast!!!! (many exclamation points....)
There's one base that has a slope of 1 at (0,1): it's the special base e.
This is almost a magical property: the rate of change of an exponential function is proportional to its value. In one case, the rate of change is the function value. The slope of the tangent line is the value of the function. Curious!
The data is represented by the blue graph -- what do you suppose the dashed graph represents?
Take a look at Figure 9, p. 395, in this section. Is the exponential doing a good job of fitting the data?