Last Time | Next Time |
A cube is an example of a Platonic solid. It's the one we're most familiar with; although anyone who's played Dungeons and Dragons knows these solids from the shapes of the dice used.
A Platonic solid is a solid for which
And here they are!
The Five Convex Regular Polyhedra (Platonic solids) -- thanks Wikipedia! | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Tetrahedron | Hexahedron or Cube |
Octahedron | Dodecahedron | Icosahedron |
fire | earth | air | universe | water |
|
# of Vertices | Edges | Faces | faces at each vertex | sides at each face | |
Tetrahedron | 4 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
Cube | 8 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 4 |
Octahedron | 6 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 3 |
Dodecahedron | 20 | 30 | 12 | 3 | 5 |
Icosahedron | 12 | 30 | 20 | 5 | 3 |
What conclusions can we draw from this data? Is there a pattern? (Of course there is!:) The pattern leads to the concept of "Duality":
"In the Hindu tradition, the icosahedron represents purusha, the male, spiritual principle, and generates the dodecahedron, representing prakriti, the female, material principle." |
(Did you know that you should "spin in the spring, flip in the fall."?)
At right he develops a graph from an amusing story about Nobel-prize winning physicist Richard Feynman, and how he got a draft deferment.
The army psychiatrist questioning him asked Feynman to put out his hands so he could examine them. Feynman stuck them out, one palm up, the other down. "No, the other way," said the psychiatrist. So Feynman reversed both hands, leaving one palm down and the other up.
Feynman wasn't merely playing mind games; he was indulging in a little group-theoretic humor. If we consider all the possible ways he could have held out his hands, along with the various transitions among them, the arrows form the same pattern as the mattress group!
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend." -- 'The corners signify people, companies or countries, and the sides connecting them signify their relationships, which can be positive (friendly, shown here as solid lines) or negative (hostile, shown as dashed lines).'
'Social scientists refer to triangles like the one on the left, with all positive, sides balanced, -- there's no reason for anyone to change how they feel, since it's reasonable to like your friend's friends. Similarly, the triangle on the right, with two negatives and a positive, is considered balanced because it causes no dissonance; even though it allows for hostility, nothing cements a friendship like hating the same person.'
'Leaving aside the verisimilitude of the model, there are interesting questions here of a purely mathematical flavor. For example, in a close-knit network where everyone knows everyone, what's the most stable state? One possibility is a nirvana of goodwill, where all relationships are positive and all triangles are balanced. But surprisingly, there are other states that are equally stable. These are states of intractable conflict, with the network split into two hostile factions. All members of a given faction are friendly with one another, but antagonistic toward everybody in the other faction. (Sound familiar?) Perhaps even more surprisingly, these polarized states are the only states as stable as nirvana. In particular, no three-party split can have all its triangles balanced.'