Last time | Next time |
The appropriate form of 1!
Now the authors assert that \(k\) is the average time between accidents for the distribution, but I believe that they've got that wrong. One way we can tell is if the units don't work out. So they say that \(k\) is in months (3 months), but \(x\) is also in months. So the units of the integral are in months squared (but are supposed to be probabilities (dimensionless numbers between 0 and 1).
The mean of an exponential distribution with rate parameter \(k\) is \(\frac{1}{k}\) (not \(k\)), a choice which makes the integral dimensionless.
The average of any function of \(x\), \(f(x)\), is obtained by multiplying \(f(x)\) times the probability density, and integrating over the domain where the integrand is non-zero: \[ \overline{f(x)} = \int_{0}^{+ \infty} f(x) k e^{-k x} d x \] Since we want the average of \(x\), this becomes \[ \overline{x} = \int_{0}^{+ \infty} x k e^{-k x} d x \] We can use substitution, \(u=-kx\), to turn this integral into one from the quiz, and find that the average value of \(x\) is indeed \(\frac{1}{k}\). Therefore, if the average time between accidents is 3 months, \(k=\frac{1}{3}\).
So the calculation we want is \[ \int_{8}^{+ \infty} \frac{1}{3} e^{-\frac{x}{3}} d x \]
or about .0077: the probability of eight months between accidents would be about \(\frac{8}{1000}\).
This makes a lot more sense than their answer, of \(3.8 \times 10^{-11}\). Think about it: even if the average time between events is 3 months, can't you imagine that it's possible that sometimes you go about three times the average between events? Like about eight in a thousand times that might occur?
It simply can't be so outrageously small as \(3.8 \times 10^{-11}\).
I'd better send an email to Gil Strang...:)
Next time we'll discuss comparisons....